Trusted by Our Partners ABN AMRO Clearing Bank, Nyca Partners, Belvedere Strategic Capital, and Gentree Fund
A plain-language breakdown of clearing firms, how they work, and why they matter – from RQD*, the infrastructure layer powering global investing.
Every time a trade is executed in a financial market, something has to happen before that trade actually means anything: the buyer has to get the securities, and the seller has to get paid. That process, the mechanics behind it, the guarantees that make it reliable, the infrastructure that makes it fast – is what a clearing firm handles.
Clearing and custody firms (clearing firm) are the backbone of financial markets. They’re not glamorous, and most investors never think about them. But without clearing firms, the markets as we know them wouldn’t function.
At its core, a clearing firm works with central market infrastructure, including DTCC subsidiaries, to help ensure its client’s side of a securities transaction is properly cleared and settled.
Here’s what clearing firms are responsible for:
Clearing firms confirm trade details, calculate settlement obligations, and coordinate the movement of securities or funds for the side of the transaction they support. Depending on whether your client is the buyer or the seller, the clearing firm helps ensure the appropriate cash or securities are available and delivered through central market infrastructure on the applicable settlement cycle, currently T+1 for most U.S. equities. Their role is to help make sure their client’s side of the transaction settles accurately and on time.
Before settlement occurs, clearing firms provide the tools to support risk management tied to trading activity, including exposure, margin, funding, and securities delivery obligations. If an issue arises before settlement, the clearing firm works to identify and resolve it so the transaction can continue moving toward completion. This oversight is a critical part of market confidence, helping support accurate, timely, and orderly settlement.
Clearing firms maintain detailed records of all transactions — positions, balances, trades, and account activity — in real time. This creates the audit trail that regulators, broker-dealers, and investors rely on.
The clearing process follows a structured lifecycle from trade execution to final settlement. Here’s how it breaks down:
A buyer and seller agree on a transaction through a broker, exchange, ATS, or other trading venue.
The trade is captured with all relevant details, including the security, price, quantity, side, account, and parties involved.
Execution is the starting point. Clearing is what happens next.
After execution, the trade details are confirmed and made available to the customer and the relevant firms in the transaction chain.
The clearing firm validates that the trade terms match, including security, quantity, price, side, account, and proceeds. Any discrepancies need to be identified and resolved quickly.
In a modern clearing environment, confirmation should happen with speed, accuracy, and transparency — not through delayed manual workflows or overnight batch processes.
For certain institutional workflows, post-trade processing also includes allocation and affirmation.
This is where trade details are assigned to the correct accounts and affirmed by the appropriate parties before settlement. Under a T+1 settlement cycle, these steps need to happen faster, making automation, transparency, and real-time visibility more important than ever.
This is where the clearing firm earns its role.
The clearing firm with support from DTCC calculate what each party owes, nets positions where applicable, and reduces the total amount of securities and cash that need to move at settlement.
Netting creates efficiency across the market by lowering settlement obligations, reducing operational friction, and helping minimize settlement risk.
Risk is monitored throughout the post-trade life cycle.
The clearing firm reviews exposures, margin requirements, funding obligations, securities availability, and other risk factors that could impact settlement.
Modern clearing infrastructure should surface risk as it changes — not after the fact. Real-time visibility gives firms the ability to identify issues earlier and act before they become larger operational problems.
Settlement only works when both sides are ready.
The buyer’s side must have the required funds available. The seller’s side must deliver the securities. The clearing firm helps coordinate these obligations and identify issues that could delay or disrupt settlement.
In a compressed settlement environment, funding and visibility of delivery are critical.
Not every post-trade event is clean.
Trades may require correction, allocation updates, funding review, delivery resolution, or fail management. A clearing firm helps manage these exceptions and move the transaction toward successful settlement.
Modern clearing infrastructure should make exceptions visible, actionable, and easier to resolve — without relying on black boxes, file drops, or delayed reporting.
Settlement is the final exchange.
Securities are transferred to the buyer’s account. Funds are transferred to the seller’s account. This step is finalized through central market infrastructure, including entities such as DTCC.
The clearing firm helps ensure settlement is completed accurately, securely, and on schedule.
Post-trade processing does not end with settlement.
The clearing firm also supports the records that broker-dealers, regulators, and clients rely on, including trade confirmations, account statements, positions, balances, activity, and transaction history.
These records are part of the trust layer in the relationship. They need to be accurate, timely, and accessible.
In modern clearing, post-trade infrastructure is not just a back-office function. It is the operating layer that helps firms move faster, manage risk better, and scale with confidence.
After a trade is executed, the work shifts from the front office to the post-trade infrastructure. Trade details are confirmed. Allocations and affirmations are completed where required. Risk is monitored. Funds and securities are prepared for delivery. Records are updated. Exceptions are surfaced and resolved.
This is where clearing infrastructure matters. In a T+1 environment, the window between execution and settlement is compressed. Firms need real-time visibility into trades, positions, balances, funding, delivery status, and exceptions — not overnight files or delayed batch reports.
Modern clearing turns post-trade processing from a back-office function into an operating advantage.
Who does what?
Not all clearing relationships look the same. There are three primary structures in the U.S. markets:
A self-clearing firm handles its own trade settlement, custody, and back-office operations in-house rather than outsourcing to a third-party clearing firm. These firms take on significant infrastructure costs and regulatory obligations in exchange for greater control over the process. Self-clearing is typically reserved for large, well-capitalized institutions.
An introducing broker executes trades and maintains client relationships, while outsourcing key post-trade and back-office functions to a clearing firm. These may include clearing, settlement, custody, margin, securities lending, financing, recordkeeping, and other operational support. This model allows introducing firms to focus on their core business and client experience without building or maintaining the complex infrastructure required to support clearing and custody operations.
A custody and clearing firm provides clearing, custody, and related services to introducing financial firms on a contracted basis. The clearer handles the mechanics of settlement, recordkeeping, and risk management while the introducing firm remains the client-facing entity. RQD* operates as a clearing and custody firm — delivering the infrastructure that powers other financial services firms.
These three terms are often used interchangeably — and that’s a mistake. They describe distinct functions in the securities lifecycle:
Clearing is the process of reconciling orders between buyers and sellers and managing the transfer of securities and funds. It’s the in-between step: after the trade is made, before the assets land in anyone’s account.
Custody refers to the safekeeping of client assets. A custodian holds securities on behalf of clients, maintains account records, and ensures assets are protected and accurately reported. Custody is an ongoing function; clearing is transactional.
Execution is the act of carrying out a trade — routing an order to a market or exchange and getting it filled. Execution happens before clearing begins.
Some firms provide all three. Others specialize in one or two. Understanding which services a provider is delivering — and how those services are separated or integrated — matters enormously when evaluating a clearing partner.
The financial markets process hundreds of millions of transactions every day. Clearing firms are what keep that volume manageable, reliable, and safe. Here’s why they matter:
By monitoring client exposure, collecting margin, managing settlement obligations, and interacting with central clearing infrastructure, clearing firms help reduce counterparty and settlement risk. Central counterparties such as NSCC and OCC provide additional protections by becoming the buyer to every seller and the seller to every buyer for eligible cleared transactions.
Clearing firms serve as shock absorbers in periods of market stress. They maintain margin requirements, monitor exposure in real time, and step in when necessary. Without them, a default by a single large participant could cascade across the entire market.
Netting — the process of consolidating multiple positions into a single net obligation — dramatically reduces the volume of securities and cash that has to physically move at settlement. Clearing firms make this possible, cutting down operational costs and settlement risk across the system.
Clearing firms operate under regulatory oversight from the SEC, FINRA, and other applicable authorities. They may also be members or participants of market utilities such as OCC, DTC, and NSCC.
Clearing firms serve a wide range of participants across the financial ecosystem:
Introducing brokers are the primary clients of clearing and custody firms. They rely on clearing partners to handle settlement, custody, and back-office operations so they can focus on clients and trading activity.
Whether they know it or not, retail and institutional investors depend on clearing firms every time they execute a trade. The security that a trade will settle correctly — and that their assets are held safely — flows directly from clearing infrastructure.
Technology-first financial platforms and neo-brokerages increasingly rely on clearing firms to provide the regulatory and operational backbone their products require. A flexible clearing partner is often the difference between a fast launch and a delayed one.
Active trading firms, including market makers, algorithmic traders, and institutional desks, require clearing partners that can handle high transaction volumes with speed and precision. The clearing relationship directly affects execution quality and risk management.
Legacy clearing firms were built for a different era. Their technology is outdated, their onboarding processes are slow, and their infrastructure wasn’t designed for the speed and flexibility that today’s broker-dealers and fintech companies require.
RQD* was built to change that. We deliver the modern clearing and custody infrastructure behind today’s brokerage, wealth, trading, and investing platforms — built API-first, real-time, and ready to scale. Our API-first architecture means we integrate with your systems the way modern software should — quickly, cleanly, and without months of back-and-forth.
We partner with broker-dealers, fintech platforms, active trading firms, and global market participants who are done settling for infrastructure that holds them back. If you’re building something that requires a clearing partner that moves as fast as you do, RQD* is required.
Legacy clearing firms were built for a different era, with outdated technology, slow onboarding, and infrastructure that was not designed for the speed, flexibility, and scale today’s Broker-Dealers, Fintech platforms, and trading firms require.
RQD* was built to change that. We deliver modern clearing and custody infrastructure for brokerage, wealth, trading, and investing platforms – built API-first, real time and ready to scale.
With RQD*, firms get faster implementation, direct API access to real-time reporting, confirmations, and account data, automated and paperless account opening with in-line CIP and identity verification, a flexible cost framework, and no lock-in agreements.
We partner with firms that are done settling for infrastructure that slows them down. If you are building a platform that requires a clearing partner that moves as fast as you do, RQD* is required.
A clearinghouse is a centralized entity — like the DTCC’s National Securities Clearing Corporation (NSCC) — that sits at the center of the market and facilitates the netting and settlement of trades across all participants. A clearing firm, by contrast, is a member of the clearinghouse that processes trades on behalf of an introducing firm and their clients. Clearing firms interact with the clearinghouse; they are not the clearinghouse itself.
After a trade is executed, the transaction moves into the post-trade lifecycle.
The trade details are confirmed, validated, risk-reviewed, cleared, and prepared for settlement. For certain institutional workflows, allocations and affirmations may also be required before settlement can occur. The clearing firm helps coordinate this process, ensuring the trade is accurately recorded, obligations are calculated, funds and securities are prepared for delivery, and exceptions are identified and resolved. Execution starts the trade. Clearing makes it final.
T+1 settlement means most U.S. securities transactions must settle one business day after the trade date. That shorter cycle places greater demands on post-trade infrastructure. Trade confirmation, allocation, affirmation, risk review, funding, securities delivery, and exception management all need to happen faster and with greater precision. For clearing firms, T+1 makes real-time visibility critical. Firms need accurate data on trades, positions, balances, margin, funding, and delivery status throughout the post-trade lifecycle — not after an overnight batch process runs.
Allocation is the process of assigning a trade to the correct account or accounts after execution. Affirmation is the process by which the relevant parties confirm that the trade details are accurate and ready for settlement. These steps are especially important in institutional workflows. Under T+1, allocation and affirmation need to happen quickly, making automation and real-time post-trade visibility increasingly important.
A trade can fail to settle when the required securities or funds are not available on settlement date. When that happens, the clearing firm helps manage the exception and works through the appropriate remediation process. This may include resolving delivery issues, coordinating funding, managing buy-ins, applying penalties, or taking other steps required by market rules.
The goal is to identify and resolve issues before they become settlement failures. Modern clearing infrastructure helps surface exceptions earlier, making them more visible, actionable, and easier to manage.
Confirmations, statements, positions, balances, and activity records are the client-facing evidence of what happened in the account. They show what was traded, what settled, what is held, what moved, and what changed. For broker-dealers and financial platforms, these records are central to client trust, regulatory compliance, operational control, and service quality. A modern clearing partner should make this information accurate, timely, and accessible.
Clearing firms typically earn revenue through a combination of transaction fees charged per trade, custody fees for holding client assets, margin interest on client debit balances, and ancillary service fees. The fee structure varies depending on the clearing model and the scope of services provided.
Yes. Clearing and custody firms in the United States are subject to significant regulatory oversight. They must meet financial, operational, reporting, customer protection, and asset segregation requirements. They also maintain records, enforce applicable margin rules, and support the reporting framework that helps keep the securities industry accountable.
RQD* Clearing is registered with the SEC, a member of FINRA, OCC, DTC, and NSCC, a participant in SIPC, and licensed in all 50 U.S. states and territories.